The Semantic Tableaux Version of the Second Incompleteness Theorem Extends Almost to Robinson's Arithmetic Q
نویسنده
چکیده
We will generalize the Second Incompleteness Theorem almost to the level of Robinson’s System Q. We will prove there exists a Π1 sentence V , such that if α is any finite consistent extension of Q+V then α will be unable to prove its Semantic Tableaux consistency. SpringerVerlag LNCS # 1847, 2000, pp. 415–430 (Tableaux 2000 Proc.)
منابع مشابه
How to Extend The Semantic Tableaux and Cut-Free Versions of The Second Incompleteness Theorem Almost to Robinson's Arithmetic Q
Let us recall that Raphael Robinson’s Arithmetic Q is an axiom system that differs from Peano Arithmetic essentially by containing no Induction axioms [13, 18]. We will generalize the semantictableaux version of the Second Incompleteness Theorem almost to the level of System Q. We will prove that there exists a single rather long Π1 sentence, valid in the standard model of the Natural Numbers a...
متن کاملOn the Partial Respects in Which a Real Valued Arithmetic System Can Verify Its Tableaux Consistency
It is known that Equations (1) – (3) are related to both generalizations of Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem and to its boundary-case exceptions. For instance, Equation (1) will enable the Second Incompleteness Theorem to apply to Hilbert deduction. Also, [36, 38] showed that the semantic tableaux version of the Second Incompleteness Theorem generalizes for essentially all axiom systems th...
متن کاملSome New Exceptions for the Semantic Tableaux Version of the Second Incompleteness Theorem
This article continues our study of axiom systems that can verify their own consistency and prove all Peano Arithmetic’s Π1 theorems. We will develop some new types of exceptions for the Semantic Tableaux Version of the Second Incompleteness Theorem.
متن کاملOn the Nature of Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem
In several recent articles, we have shown how such totality conditions are related to both generalizations and boundary-case exceptions for the Second Incompleteness Theorem. For instance, our article [2] showed how essentially all axiom systems recognizing addition and multiplication as “total” functions are unable to prove a theorem affirming their semantic tableaux consistency. In contrast, ...
متن کاملPassive induction and a solution to a Paris-Wilkie open question
In 1981, Paris and Wilkie raised the open question about whether and to what extent the axiom system IΣ0 did satisfy the Second Incompleteness Theorem under Semantic Tableaux deduction. Our prior work showed that the semantic tableaux version of the Second Incompleteness Theorem did generalize for the most common definition of IΣ0 appearing in the standard textbooks. However, there was an alter...
متن کامل